Lori Rappaport LaCroix v. Western District of Kentucky
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Plaintiff Lori Rappaport LaCroix pro se appeals the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of her complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). After review, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND FACTS
A. The Complaint
On November 18,2014, Plaintiff LaCroix filed a pro se complaint against two federal district courts, the Green Mountain Financial Fund, LLC, Morgan Stanley, the State of Indiana, the State of New York, the town of Clarksville, Indiana, several law firms, and many other individuals, including several attorneys and judges, alleging 69 causes of action related, in some way, to the 1998 death of her father,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- GJR Investments, Inc. v. County of EscambiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Ned Hughes v. Charles LottCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Hoffer v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2017
- Harrington v. Racki (In re Bishop)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- Anglin v. Officer GL TrujilloDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023
- Arnold Denard Snelling v. Jody Phillips, etc., et al.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
- Borghese v. WatersDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.