Legal Opinion
Ned Hughes v. Charles Lott
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 14, 2003No. 02-11508PublishedCited by 725 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARKETT, Circuit Judge:
Ned Hughes appeals the district court’s dismissal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii), of his pro se and informa pauperis civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several City of Mobile police officers. In his complaint, Hughes alleges that the police officers vio lated his Fourth Amendment rights by-stopping, searching, and arresting him without reasonable suspicion, probable cause, or a warrant. He also alleges that the officers’ treatment of him after the initial stop and arrest, including holding him against his will, forcing him to remove…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by725 opinions
- Alba v. MontfordCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- John Ruddin Brown v. Lisa JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Miller v. DonaldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Boxer X v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Fred Dalton Brooks v. WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
720 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.