Daigneault v. Consolidated Controls Corp./Eaton Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, Lany L. Daigneault, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendants’1 motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction the plaintiffs motion for contempt. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that it was without jurisdiction to rule on the motion for contempt. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following procedural history is relevant to our resolution of the plaintiffs appeal. On July 7, 1999, the plaintiff filed a seven count revised complaint against the defendants. Just prior to the commencement of the jury…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Lusas v. St. Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Sicaras v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Morelli v. Manpower, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
4Cited by11 opinions
- Melendez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Doe v. BemerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. TwineConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Daigneault v. Judicial BranchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Friedman v. GomezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.