Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Gomez

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 11, 2017No. AC37930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlvord, J.

The defendants, Maria Margarita Gomez, Guillermo Sanchez, Jr. (Sanchez Jr.), and Eric Sanchez, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiff Drew Friedman 1 on his summary process complaint and against the defendants on their special defenses and counterclaims. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court (1) improperly limited its jurisdiction when it concluded that it did not have the authority to determine title to the subject property, (2) improperly determined that Guillermo Sanchez, Sr. (Sanchez Sr.), was no longer a party…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cadle Co. v. D'AddarioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Fellows v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Filosi v. HawkinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  4. Walter v. Home National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  5. Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Dairy Mart, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Renaissance Management Co. v. BarnesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. U.S. Bank, National Assn. v. MamudiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  3. Samsel v. ParksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API