Legal Opinion

D.O. ex rel C.O. v. Borden

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 31, 2011No. Civil Action No. 10-cv-2339 (NLH) (AMD)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HILLMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, D.O. and M.O., on behalf of their minor child C.O., M.W. and G.W., on behalf of their minor child, C.W., and J.G., individually,1 filed a putative class action suit in this Court against Defendants, Edward J. Borden, Jr., a Commissioner and the Public Safety Director of the Borough of Haddonfield, the Haddonfield Police Department, and the Borough of Haddonfield. According to Plaintiffs, Defendants have violated Attorney General Law En*213forcement Directive 2008-2, and its predecessor, Law Enforcement Directive 2005^4 (individually or collectively, “the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LASCHE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
  2. MORALES v. COUNTY OF CAMDENDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API