Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HILLMAN, District Judge.
This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief, to enforce a rail tariff agreement between a carrier and a shipper and to enjoin the carrier from charging a higher rate, set forth in a supplemental tariff which was filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission (hereinafter “ICC”). Federal jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the federal question arising under Section 208(a)(i)(2) and (j) of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, [49 U.S.C. § 10713(0(2) and (j)]. The case is now before the court on…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gortney v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Cochran v. Ernst & YoungDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
- The Kansas Power & Light Company, State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas, Intervening v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Karl Wendt Farm Equipment Co., Inc., Cross-Appellee v. International Harvester Co. And International Harvester Credit Corp., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Walter Toebe & Co. v. Receiver of F Yeager Bridge & Culvert Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.