Legal Opinion
Watkins v. Peterson Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided July 6, 1999No. CS-96-602-FVSPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
VAN SICKLE, District Judge.
THIS MATTER came before the Court based upon cross motions for summary judgment. The plaintiffs were represented by Timothy W. Durkop and Michael D. Kinkley; the defendant by Michael J. Beyer.
BACKGROUND
Diane Bohnet and Percy Watkins allege Peterson Enterprises, Inc. violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692o, the Washington Collection Agency Act, RCW 19.16.100-.950, and the Washington Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86.010-920. The Court has jurisdiction over the FDCPA claim pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Ken Baker v. G. C. Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wendelyn Harvey v. Great Seneca Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Nedzad Miljkovic v. Shafritz and Dinkin, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Johnson v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Johnson v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Okyere v. Palisades Collection, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.