Legal Opinion

Weitzman v. Handy

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided October 15, 1902No. 163PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motion to dismiss appeal for insufficiency of notice.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

This case came on for hearing before the court on motion of the plaintiff to dismiss the appeal because of the insufficiency of the notice of appeal in the lower court. Several grounds are assigned in the motion for such dismissal, some of which are in substance as follows ;

That the defendants are not properly described in the notice : that the judgment referred to in the notice of appeal is not so described that it could be identified; that there is no date given in said notice on which the judgment sought to be appealed from was entered, and the notice does not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neppach v. JordanOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Lewis v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kingsbury v. Pacific Coal & Transp. Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1906
  2. United States v. LarsenDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1905
  3. Frizzell v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1920
  4. Markuson v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1912
  5. Paddy v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API