Paddy v. Martin
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA, District Judge.
Appellee’s motion for dismissal of the appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court for Juneau Precinct, presents the question whether the notice of appeal is sufficient under Weitzman v. Handy, 1 Alaska 658; Kingsbury v. Pacific Coast & Transp. Co., 3 Alaska 41; Markuson v. Clark, 4 Alaska 606; Frizzell v. Ryan, 6 Alaska 316. *368Appellant contends that stare decisis does not require blind adherence to these ancient precedents and that the question should, be re-examined in the light of the reformed procedure and its avowed purpose to further justice by freeing litigation of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Weitzman v. HandyDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1902
- Kingsbury v. Pacific Coal & Transp. Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1906
- Frizzell v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1920
- Markuson v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1912
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. BoyerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1977