Legal Opinion

Paddy v. Martin

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided December 19, 1950No. 6329-APublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOLTA, District Judge.

Appellee’s motion for dismissal of the appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court for Juneau Precinct, presents the question whether the notice of appeal is sufficient under Weitzman v. Handy, 1 Alaska 658; Kingsbury v. Pacific Coast & Transp. Co., 3 Alaska 41; Markuson v. Clark, 4 Alaska 606; Frizzell v. Ryan, 6 Alaska 316. *368Appellant contends that stare decisis does not require blind adherence to these ancient precedents and that the question should, be re-examined in the light of the reformed procedure and its avowed purpose to further justice by freeing litigation of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weitzman v. HandyDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1902
  2. Kingsbury v. Pacific Coal & Transp. Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1906
  3. Frizzell v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1920
  4. Markuson v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. BoyerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API