Legal Opinion

Neppach v. Jordan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1886PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Multnomah County. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Judgment was rendered against Jordan in a Justice’s Court. Jordan appealed to the Circuit Court. In the Circuit Court the appellee in the appeal moved to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the notice of appeal was insufficient, in this: 1. That it failed to describe the court in which the judgment was rendered; 2. That it failed to describe the parties; 3. That it failed to describe the judgment. The notice was of the tenor following:

*247Justice’s Court, eor Couch Precinct.

4‘ William Neppach, Plaintiff, v. W. P. Jordan, Defendant.

“ NOTICE, OE APPEAL-CIVIL ACTION.

“ To William…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Pettingill v. DonnellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Keady v. United Rys. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Mendenhall v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Silbaugh v. Guardian Building & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. McFarland v. HuenersOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Cameron v. Wasco CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API