William BAGSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST & SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
In this action, the plaintiff, William Bags-by, challenges the denial of higher monthly pension benefits under § 502(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) (ERISA). The issue is whether the defendant, the Central States, Southeast and Southwest Pension Plan, acted reasonably in determining that the plaintiff did not qualify for a so-called “30-And-Out Pension” paying $2,000 a month. The trustees of the Central States Plan denied the plaintiffs claim for the 30-And-Out Pension because the plaintiffs employer,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- John Pokratz, Cross-Appellee v. Jones Dairy Farm, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Roy C. Tassinare v. American National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pfahler v. National Latex Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- University Hospitals of Cleveland v. Emerson Electric Company and Emerson Electric Company Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Monks v. Keystone Powdered Metal Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- Caudill v. Sears Transition Pay PlanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Kennedy v. United Healthcare of Ohio, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.