Legal Opinion

William BAGSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST & SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1998No. 97-6209PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

In this action, the plaintiff, William Bags-by, challenges the denial of higher monthly pension benefits under § 502(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) (ERISA). The issue is whether the defendant, the Central States, Southeast and Southwest Pension Plan, acted reasonably in determining that the plaintiff did not qualify for a so-called “30-And-Out Pension” paying $2,000 a month. The trustees of the Central States Plan denied the plaintiffs claim for the 30-And-Out Pension because the plaintiffs employer,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. John Pokratz, Cross-Appellee v. Jones Dairy Farm, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Roy C. Tassinare v. American National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pfahler v. National Latex Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. University Hospitals of Cleveland v. Emerson Electric Company and Emerson Electric Company Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. Monks v. Keystone Powdered Metal Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
  4. Caudill v. Sears Transition Pay PlanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  5. Kennedy v. United Healthcare of Ohio, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API