Legal Opinion

Blair v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided March 2, 2016No. Case No.: 4:13-CV-1789-VEHPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, ■ United States District Judge

I. Introduction and Procedural History

On August 22, 2013, Plaintiff Sharon Blair (“Ms. Blair”) initiated this long-term disability benefits case against Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) in the Circuit Court of Etowah County. (Doc. 1-1 at 2-4; Doc. 29-1 at 2-4).1 MetLife removed Ms. Blair’s state court action to this court on September 26, 2013, on the basis of federal preemption under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). (Doc. 1; id. at 2-3 ¶¶ 5-6).

Prior to that, on…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Madison v. Greater Georgia Life Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
  2. Tcherneshoff v. Northrop Grumman CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API