Legal Opinion
Samuel v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 2, 1991No. 89 Civ. 2354(SWK)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
This action is brought by plaintiff Samuel, an employee of defendant Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith (hereinafter “Merrill Lynch”), for alleged violation and intentional violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (hereinafter “ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. and violation of Section 296 of the New York Execu tive Law. She alleges that defendant illegally failed to promote her on the basis of age discrimination. Defendant now moves to dismiss the state law claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and for summary judgment and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Patrowich v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lambert v. Genesee HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Lambert v. Genesee HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Nweke v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Meckenberg v. New York City Off-Track BettingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Lloyd v. WABC-TVDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.