Legal Opinion

Horton Co. v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 1980No. Civ. A. No. 79-1652PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

COHILL, District Judge.

The defendant in this contract action moves to join an additional party on its counterclaim against the plaintiff. The two parties had a commercial contract whereby the defendant was to design and produce component parts for the plaintiff’s use in manufacturing. After a dispute arose over whether some of the parts met the quality requirements of the contract, plaintiff stopped payment on a check, and defendant thereafter demanded a surety bond before it would resume production. Plaintiff furnished such a bond. The additional party sought to be joined is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marvin Dudley v. Gilbert P. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Southern Railway System v. Leyden Shipping Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  3. Pennsylvania R. v. Lattavo Bros.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. NangleAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Morris v. Paul Revere Insurance GroupDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  3. Pena v. McArthurDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
  4. Gruening v. SucicDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. SER Energy Corp. of America v. Hon. John Lewis Marks, JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API