Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Oehler

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 18, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

'Appeal from Dubuque District Court. — Hon. J. L. Husted, Judge. Action for damages for false imprisonment. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case, the jury, under instruction from the court, returned a verdict for defendants. From a judgment entered thereon against plaintiff for costs, he appeals.-

1Opinion of the CourtWaterman, J.

*1571 *156The case made by plaintiff was substantially this: The defendant Oehler was a justice of the *157peace in and for Dubuque county. The other defendants, Wessel and Meyers, were deputized constables, whose connection with the matter will duly appear. On July 4, 1893, the justice issued a subpoena, commanding plaintiff to appear before him at. 9 o’cock a. m. of • said day, and testify” in an action wherein one Sarah Jane Galloway was plaintiff and the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company was defendant. No such action was pending before the justice. This subpoena was served on that day by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RowlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. St. Louis, Kennett & Southern Railroad v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Johnston v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Brown v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Heath v. HalfhillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Linder v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  2. In Re PeartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. State v. McGaheyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  4. McGrew ex rel. McGrew v. HolmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Michel v. Boxholm Co-operative CreamerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API