Legal Opinion

Michel v. Boxholm Co-operative Creamery

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 14, 1905PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from. Boone District Gourt..— TIon. «T. R. Whitaker, Judge. Action for damages resulting from the discharge of plaintiff before the expiration of the time he was to work for defendant as a butter maker. Judgment for plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

1. Legal holidays: 'Issues had been joined at a.previous term of court, and the cause was assigned for trial on February 22, 1904. The fact that this was a legal holiday was one of the grounds of a motion for continuance, . filed February 19th, and when the case was called for trial defendant objected to being required to appear and enter upon the trial, and declined to participate. The motion and objection were overruled.

Section 3541 of the Code, found in the chapter relating to the manner of commencing actions, after enacting that the mode of appearance in court may be (1) by filing a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whipple v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Glenn v. EddySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
  3. Hamer v. SearsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. Chambers v. OehlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pueblo v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
  2. Pueblo v. Carmen Centrale, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1934
  3. Garner v. Tulsa Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Márquez v. Insular Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1930
  5. People of Puerto Rico v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API