Legal Opinion

Brown v. Moore

California Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1882No. 8,520PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Application for writ of Prohibition.

1Opinion of the Court

Ross, J.:

Application for a writ prohibiting the respondent from proceeding further in the matter of certain contempt proceedings against the petitioners.

From the verified petition it appears that during the month of April, 1882, sundry suits at law were commenced by divers persons against one Bartlett in the Justices’ Courts of Amador county to recover certain moneys alleged to be due from Bartlett to the respective plaintiffs in those suits. Judgment passed for the plaintiffs therein, on which executions were issued and placed in the hands of the petitioners in the present proceeding, who…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quimbo Appo v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Hartman v. OlveraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Williams v. DwinelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. In Re PeartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. MacWatters v. StockslagerIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Maier v. LuceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Johnston v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API