Legal Opinion

Groenewold v. Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 22, 1945No. 31722PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HURST, V.C.J.

The decisive question is whether the decision of the board of county commissioners to abandon a bridge on a public highway and remove the material for use in other bridges in the county is appealable, under 19 O.S. 1941 § 431.

The resolution of the board of county commissioners of Kingfisher county, passed on April 19, 1943, is as follows:

“Whereas, the Loyal-Lacey Cimarron river bridge in Kingfisher County, Oklahoma, was damaged by high water on April 19th or 20th, 1942, and eight spans of said bridge were washed out by said high water, and,
“Whereas, the repair of said bridge at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ponischil v. Hoquiam Sash & Door Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State Ex Rel. Clark v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Parker v. Board of Com'rs of Tillman CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Board of Com'rs of Sequoyah County v. McGowanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Board of Com'rs v. TrippetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bettencourt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Chandler Materials v. Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Tulsa Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Gregory v. Board of County Comm'rs of Rogers CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  4. Stuart v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Garrett v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API