Legal Opinion
Pall v. Pall
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 12, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The plaintiff was injured while riding in a car driven by her son. She secured a verdict against him and he has appealed. The only assignment of error is based on the refusal of the trial court to set aside the verdict.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts: All the persons concerned in this affair are related and live in a two-family house in Fairfield. On Memorial Day, 1947, the plaintiff’s two-year-old granddaughter fell on the back porch of this house and cut her forehead badly. It bled profusely and there was great excitement. A car belonging to the plaintiff’s husband…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dean v. HershowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Cote v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Pinckard v. PeaseWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Gerardi v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Tenney v. Baird Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zullo v. ZulloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Cummings v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Anthony Csizmadia v. P. Ballantine & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Perakos v. Lombard Bros., Inc.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1955
- Perakos v. Lombard Bros., Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1955