Legal Opinion

Santema v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & Paroles

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2007No. 24231PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Scot Jeffrey Santema (Santema) appeals the lower court’s affirmance of his parole eligibility date calculated by the South Dakota Board of Pardons & Paroles (Board). We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Santema has been in the custody of the Department of Corrections (Department) since 1988 on six felony convictions arising both before and after July 1, 1996. In 1988, his first three felonies resulted in sentences of three years, six years and twelve years. The twelve year sentence ran consecutive to the three and six year sentences, which ran concurrent to each other. He was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Austad v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Hoeft v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rowley v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Dale v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Ibrahim v. Dep't of Public SafetySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Iron Shell v. Warden, Mike Durfee State PrisonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023
  5. Rowley v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API