Legal Opinion
Austad v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & Paroles
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 2006No. 23914PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.. [¶ 1.] Christopher Austad (Austad) was sentenced to ten years in the South Dakota Penitentiary for grand theft. The sentencing court suspended six of those ten years. In preparation for his release from the Penitentiary to serve his suspended term, Austad signed a suspended sentence supervision agreement (supervision agreement) which subjected him to certain conditions. Prior to his release, Austad allegedly violated two of the conditions. Upon review, the Board of Pardons and Parole (Board) found that Austad violated the supervision agreement and revoked Aus-tad’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. ArmstrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Acevedo v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Santema v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Brant v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Mann v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.