Dale v. Young
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] James Dale filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that his penitentiary sentences were miscalculated. The habeas court denied Dale’s application. We affirm.
Background
[¶2.] In 2001, Dale pleaded guilty to third-degree burglary and possession of burglary tools for his role in burglarizing the Watertown Municipal Golf . Course. The circuit court sentenced Dale to two consecutive terms of incarceration: 10 years for burglary and 5 years for possession of burglary tools. The court entered separate judgments of conviction for each count. Dale was granted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Goetz v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Lewis & Clark Rural Water System, Inc. v. SeebaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. SielerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Reck v. S.D. Bd. of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. BariteauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Reck v. S.D. Bd. of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Hauck v. Clay County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Olson, Blake, Massie v. Butte County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.