Legal Opinion

Dale v. Young

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2015No. 27338PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] James Dale filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that his penitentiary sentences were miscalculated. The habeas court denied Dale’s application. We affirm.

Background

[¶2.] In 2001, Dale pleaded guilty to third-degree burglary and possession of burglary tools for his role in burglarizing the Watertown Municipal Golf . Course. The circuit court sentenced Dale to two consecutive terms of incarceration: 10 years for burglary and 5 years for possession of burglary tools. The court entered separate judgments of conviction for each count. Dale was granted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Goetz v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Lewis & Clark Rural Water System, Inc. v. SeebaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. SielerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Reck v. S.D. Bd. of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. BariteauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Reck v. S.D. Bd. of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Hauck v. Clay County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Olson, Blake, Massie v. Butte County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API