Legal Opinion
Reetz v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided February 16, 2018No. CASE NO. C17–0084JLRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the court are Plaintiff Kristen Reetz's and Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company's ("Hartford") cross motions for judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52, (Pl. Mot. (Dkt. # 29) ); (Def. Mot. (Dkt. # 31).) Each party opposes the other's motion for judgment. (Pl. Resp. (Dkt. # 33); Def. Resp. (Dkt. # 32).) The court has considered the motions, the parties' submissions in opposition to and in support of the motions, the administrative record, and the applicable law. Being fully advised,1 the court…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kathryn L. Benecke v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Dennis Paese v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pike v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2019
- Chapin v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Kieserman v. Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Koehnke v. Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Logan v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.