Legal Opinion

Koehnke v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 19, 2025No. 6:23-cv-00819Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION DEBBIE KOEHNKE. Civ. No. 6:23-cv-00819-AA Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA Defendant. ________________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge: The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) provides that an ERISA plan “participant” may bring a civil action in federal court “to recover benefits due to [them] under the terms of his plan, to enforce [their] rights under the terms of the plan, or to clarify [their] rights to future benefits under the terms of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API