Koehnke v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION DEBBIE KOEHNKE. Civ. No. 6:23-cv-00819-AA Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA Defendant. ________________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge: The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) provides that an ERISA plan “participant” may bring a civil action in federal court “to recover benefits due to [them] under the terms of his plan, to enforce [their] rights under the terms of the plan, or to clarify [their] rights to future benefits under the terms of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.