Legal Opinion

Pike v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided March 27, 2019No. Civil No. 4:17CV772PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 31, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, finding for Plaintiff under recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a). Dkt.

*1024# 33. Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company ("Defendant") filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff Gina Pike ("Plaintiff") filed a response to the…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Batchelor v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
  2. Bayer v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
  3. Byerly v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020
  4. Fonseca v. Standard Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
  5. Gray v. Minnesota Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API