Legal Opinion
Jackson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 8, 2001No. 98-CF-1620, 99-CF-99PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
These consolidated appeals from drug convictions present the issue, among others, of whether the trial judge in each case erred in refusing to order disclosure of information under Super. CtCrim. R. 16 which the defendants claimed was relevant to their decision whether to call as a witness and cross-examine the chemist who analyzed the controlled substances in question. See D.C.Code § 33-556 (1998). Principally at issue is a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Form 86, a worksheet which documents the tests performed by the chemist and the results thereof. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Punch v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- United States v. ManningCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hinton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Damian J. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Antwan Buchanan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- IN RE KAREN PERRYDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.