Legal Opinion

United States v. Schwarz

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided September 10, 1981No. CM 440676PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MITCHELL, Senior Judge:

Along with the offense of bribery (Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1976)), appellant was found guilty of six separate acts of forgery. (Article 123, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 923 (1976)). The sufficiency of the forgery specifications to state an offense is an issue before us, notwithstanding appellant’s plea of guilty and his counsel’s omitting an attack on the sufficiency at trial.

With the exception of the name of the victim the specifications read identically:

In that Specialist Four William P. Schwarz, US Army,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. SellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. HuntUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. PhillipsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  4. United States v. HuntU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  5. United States v. GranberryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. SchwarzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. LeeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. DardenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. PalmerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API