Legal Opinion

United States v. Palmer

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided September 30, 1982No. ACM S25680PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

2Per curiam

We have before us three unusual specifications involving Credit Union share drafts. Despite the fact that the specifications do not set forth the instruments involved in haec verba, we find them an acceptable alternative to the conventional form and affirm.

Three specifications of Charge III, violations of Article 123a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 923a, are in question.* Each specification alleges a “check” drawn upon the Barksdale Federal Credit Union. These instruments were payable through the First Bank of Northfield, Louisiana, but none of these specifications…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. GrubbsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. SchwarzU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
  4. United States v. YarbroughU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. EnglishU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API