Smith v. Beard
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — -Hon. E. D. Bewson, Judge.
1Per curiam
Motion is made to strike the statement of facts and dismiss this appeal for the reason that all the parties who appeared in the case below and against whom the judgment was taken did not join in the appeal of appellants, or were not served with notice of appeal by the appellants. The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed under the rule announced by this court in Winters v. Gray's Harbor Boom Co., 19 Wash. 346 (53 Pac. 368), and many other decisions of this court.
A supplemental record has been filed by the appellants, but we think the showing therein made as to the service of parties upon whom…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fairfield v. BinnianWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Northern Counties Investment Trust v. HenderWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Puckett v. MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Winters v. Gray's Harbor Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sipes v. Puget Sound Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
- Universal Automobile Ins. Co. v. CulbersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Hinton v. CarmodyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Den Bleyker v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- David v. GuichWashington Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.