Legal Opinion

David v. Guich

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1902No. 4347PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — lion. William O. Chapman, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Dunbar, J.

Respondents move to strike out appellants’ brief, dismiss the appeal, and affirm the judgment herein, for the following reasons: (1) That the brief does not contain references to the pages of the transcript for verification, or contain a clear statement of the case; and that, this being an equity case, tried by the court without a jury, the appellants have failed to print the findings of fact or exceptions thereto, or the findings requested by appellants, which were refused, or any part thereof, upon any of the questions sought to be raised…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Northern Counties Investment Trust v. HenderWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Smith v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Savage v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Ramage v. LittlejohnWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Smithson v. WoodinWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. Art Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Hinton v. CarmodyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Den Bleyker v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Boris v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API