Legal Opinion

Brotemarkle v. Washum

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided July 24, 2024No. 1:23-cv-04382Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION Clinton G. Brotemarkle, III, ) Case No. 1:23-cv-04382-JDA ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) OPINION AND ORDER ) Mark Washum; Ascend, LLC a/k/a ) Ascend Logistics, LLC; Milan Supply ) Chain Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Milan ) Express Company, Inc.; John/Jane ) Does; Richard Roe Corporations, ) ) Defendants. ) ) –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– This matter is before the Court on motions for partial summary judgment and for the Court to resolve their partial summary judgment motion on the record or, in the alternative, hold…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API