Legal Opinion

HOUTCHENS v. Lane

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1965No. 30,717 and 30,718PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, C. J.

These two cases have been consolidated on appeal for argument and determination. They both involve an appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus. The appellants were each found guilty of petit larceny while armed with a deadly weapon, by a jury in the Knox Circuit Court. The trial judge fixed the sentences. It is contended that the jury, rather than the trial judge, should have fixed the sentences.

We have first presented to us whether or not this Court has jurisdiction in an appeal of this character and whether or not a motion for a new trial is the proper manner for presenting alleged…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rooker v. BruceIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Fisk v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. TOWN OF HOMECROFT v. MacBethIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Briggs v. SneghanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. ReaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Higgins v. HaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Robinson v. WroblewskiIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State Ex Rel. Sendak v. Marion County Superior Court, Room No. 2Indiana Supreme Court · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API