Settle v. McWhorter
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
1. A proceeding for contempt in violation of a mandamus absolute is so connected with the mandamus that a writ of error to review a judgment therein should be treated as a case involving an extraordinary remedy within the constitutional provision conferring jurisdiction upon this court. Ficklen v. Washington, 141 Ga. 441 (81 S. E. 123); Odom v. McDilda, 155 Ga. 688 (117 S. E. 649); Smith v. Lott, 156 Ga. 590 (119 S. E. 400, 30 A. L. R. 145); Tomlin v. Rome Stove & Range Co., 183 Ga. 183 (187 S. E. 879); Powell v. Powell, 200 Ga. 379 (37 S. E. 2d, 191); Wagner v. Commercial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Powell v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Tomlin v. Rome Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Ficklen v. MayorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Smith v. LottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Wagner v. Commercial Printers Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Board of Trustees v. MabryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Board of Trustees v. MabryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Melvin C. Jones v. State Board of Pardons and ParolesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Tony Moore Jr. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016