Legal Opinion

Tomlin v. Rome Stove & Range Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 14, 1936No. 11292PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

1. An attachment for contempt in violating an injunctive order, though having some of the characteristics of a criminal proceeding, is so connected with the injunction that a writ of error to review a judgment imposing a fine or a term of imprisonment for such contempt should be treated as an equity case within the constitutional provision relating to the jurisdiction of this court. Hayden v. Phinizy, 67 Ga. 758; Warner v. Martin, 124 Ga. 387 (52 S. E. 446, 4 Ann. Cas. 180); Gray v. Gray, 127 Ga. 345 (56 S. E. 438) ; Carson v. Ennis, 146 Ga. 726 (5) (92. S. E. 221, L. R. A.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rodd v. VerageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Warner v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Carson v. EnnisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  4. Murphey v. HarkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Hayden v. PhinizySupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Patten v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Simpson v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Corley v. Crompton-Highland Mills Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Huckaby v. Griffin Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Alred v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API