Legal Opinion

Chicago Specialty Shoe Co. v. Uhwat

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 17, 1916No. Gen. No. 21,536PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Newcomer, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

By this writ of error defendant seeks to have reversed a judgment rendered against him in the Municipal Court for $11.41.

Plaintiff in its statement of claim alleges that on December 7, 1914, one F. Wanotowicz owed plaintiff $11.41 for merchandise sold to him; that on January 4,1915, said Wanotowicz sold his stock of merchandise to the defendant in bulk, said merchandise being valued at $500; that the “said parties in violation of the statutes of the State of Illinois, in force and effect on said date, did not notify the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bewley v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Dobson v. MoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ogden Avenue State Bank v. CherryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
  2. Browning v. SpurrierAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
  3. Grossfield & Roe Co. v. ZanniAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  4. Wikelund Wholesale Co. v. Tile World Factory Tile WarehouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Wikelund Wholesale Co. v. Tile World Factory Tile WarehouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API