Legal Opinion

Grossfield & Roe Co. v. Zanni

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 3, 1926No. Gen. No. 30,249PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Taylor

This is an appeal from a judgment obtained by the plaintiff, Grossfield & Eoe Company, in the municipal court of Chicago, against the defendant Vito Daltolico, in the sum of $160.95.

On October 23, 1924, the plaintiff filed a verified statement of claim, in which Antonio Zanni, Vito Daltolico and Marco Lungo were described as defendants, alleging that the defendant Antonio Zanni was indebted to it in the sum of $160.95, for goods, wares and merchandise consisting of groceries sold and delivered to the defendant Antonio Zanni in July, 1924; and “that the said Zanni subsequently sold his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Page v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  2. Ogden Avenue State Bank v. CherryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
  3. Chicago Specialty Shoe Co. v. UhwatAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  4. Epstein v. Fort Dearborn Motor Cartage Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wikelund Wholesale Co. v. Tile World Factory Tile WarehouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Wikelund Wholesale Co. v. Tile World Factory Tile WarehouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API