Jarvis v. Frey
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.
The respondent, Universal Lumber & Mill Company, was a party to and a cross-complainant in a consolidated action to enforce the payment of certain mechanics’ liens. Defendant Frey was the owner, defendant Campbell was the original contractor and cross-defendant, and the cross-defendant and appellant Pacific Surety Company was the surety upon' the contractor’s undertaking, conditioned on the faithful performance by him of his contract, and binding the súrety, if Campbell failed to do so, to pay for any materials or supplies furnished for and in performance of his contract. The trial court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Stein v. LeemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Glassell v. HansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Jarvis v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- O'Neil v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
- Rebold v. National Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Montana A.F. Corp. v. Federal Surety Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929