Legal Opinion

Salley v. Central Arkansas Transit Authority

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 9, 1996No. 96-630PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Appellant Valerie Salley was a passenger in appellee Central Arkansas Transit Authority’s (CAT’s) bus when it collided with a car operated by an uninsured motorist. Salley subsequently filed suit against CAT, alleging that she had sustained injuries resulting from the collision and that CAT, as a common carrier, had a duty to carry uninsured motorist coverage or to be self-insured. CAT filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted, holding CAT is a governmental public transit system, and as such, the General Assembly specifically delimited its liability…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bolden v. WattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Vandiver v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Board of Trustees v. StodolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Kelly v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Kelly v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Kelly v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API