Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Martin
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 14, 2014No. CV-14-367PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Justice.
11 John K. Kelly appeals from the Pulaski County Circuit Court’s order finding that Judge Timothy D. Fox was eligible “to be a candidate for the position of Circuit Judge, Judicial District 06, Division 6, Sub-district 6.2, in the election for said judgeship scheduled to be conducted on May 20, 2014.” Specifically, Kelly asserts that Judge Fox was delinquent in the payment of his 2013 annual license fee from March 2 until April 16, 2013. Kelly concludes that because he was delinquent for that period of time, he was not a “licensed attorney” for the six years…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Crockett v. C.A.G. Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- Wells v. RiviereSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- City of Fayetteville v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- In Re Supreme Court License FeesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chandler v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Protect Fayetteville v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
- Bailey v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Floyd v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- State of Arkansas; Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration; And Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration, Alcoholic Beverage Control Division v. Good Day Farm Arkansas, LLC; And Capital City Medicinals, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.