Sowash v. Emerson
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County, and from an order denying a new trial. Clifton H. Conniek, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Paragraph two of the complaint in this action alleges that the plaintiff, between the first day of October, 1913, and the twentieth day of September, 1914, at the city of Areata, county of Humboldt, rendered certain special services for the defendant’s intestate, Thomas R. Emerson; that said special services consisted of taking care and personal charge of said Thomas R. Emerson during all of the period mentioned, “looking after him and giving him a home and personal attention all of said time, frequently when said Emerson was in a besotted and drunken condition, and helpless from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pew v. First National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Hay v. PetersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1896
- Cany v. HalleckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Schroeder v. SchroederSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- New York Life Insurance v. GoodrichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lazzarevich v. LazzarevichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Ross v. RaymerWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Miller v. Campbell, Warburton, Fitzsimmons, Smith, Mendel & PastoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Doane v. MarquiseeMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Keith v. KottasMontana Supreme Court · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.