Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 9, 1952No. [No. 156, October Term, 1951.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkell, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence on conviction of bookmaking. Defendant was arrested on a warrant charging bookmaking on October 19, 1951. Before the magistrate the State’s Attorney prayed a jury trial. Code, Art. 52, sec. 13A. The case was tried in the circuit court without a jury, and defendant was found guilty.

Two questions are presented, (1) whether a search warrant should have been quashed because in it (a) the offense charged was erroneously referred to “as defined in Chapter 81 of the Acts * * * of 1950” and (b) defendant, “the individual to be searched”, was described…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. MedartSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. United States v. BorkowskiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1920
  4. West v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. United States v. KaplanDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gattus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  2. Greenwald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Mazer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  4. Noel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  5. Yanch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API