Legal Opinion
United States v. Duane A. Duvall
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 14, 2001No. 00-3977PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Duane Duvall was convicted of possession with intent to distribute a substance or mixture containing methamphetamine. His primary argument on appeal is that the government’s pretrial notice of its expert testimony was inadequate under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(a)(1)(E). We agree that the government’s notice was inadequate, but find that any error in admitting the testimony was harmless. We also find no error in the district court’s exclusion of testimony regarding the purity of the mixtures found. Finally, we reject Duvall’s argument that his conviction…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Wendell Nance, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Richard Dale Talbott, Applicant v. State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Guy J. WestmorelandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Jerome BroughCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sally Naeem v. McKesson Drug Company and Dan MontreuilCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Abraham HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. OriedoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.