Metalock Repair Service, Inc., and Lois R. Morrison v. Hal W. Harman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court denying the motion of the appellants Metaloek and Morrison to dissolve a preliminary injunction. The facts in the case and the history of the litigation between the parties are set forth in our previous opinion reported in 258 F.2d 809. In that opinion, we vacated the order appealed from and remanded the cause to the District Court to state its findings of fact and conclusions of law. The District Court complied and re-entered the order denying appellants’ motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction which resulted in the present appeal.
Th…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- G. & C. Merriam Co. v. SaalfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. FelgemakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Metalock Repair Service, Inc., and Lois R. Morrison v. Hal W. HarmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ruddies v. Auburn Spark Plug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Hydro-Clear Corp. v. Aer-O-Flo Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1970
- Sterling Manufacturing Co. v. Radio ShackDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1973
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1970