State v. Palmquist
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The defendant demurred to an information charging him with taking indecent liberties with a girl of the age of 14 years and under the age of 16, contrary to the provisions of L. 1927, p. 546, c. 394, which is amendatory of G. S. 1923, § 10132. The point of the demurrer is that the statute is unconstitutional in raising the age of consent from 14 years to 16 years. The trial court certifies the question to this court pursuant to G. S. 1923, § 10756, as important and doubtful.
The statute prior to the 1927 amendment was directed against any person who took indecent liberties with or on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Watkins v. BigelowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- State ex rel. Olson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Megins v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Hjelm v. PattersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
3Cited by5 opinions
- Administrator of Veterans' Affairs v. U. S. National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Egekvist Bakeries, Inc. v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Benson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Lyman v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929