LG Display Co. v. AU Optronics Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
In the first phase of the Bench Trial in this patent infringement action, Defendants, AUO Optronics Corporation and AUO Optronics Corporation America (collectively, “AUO”), asserted four patents and seven claims1 against Plaintiff, LG Display Co., Ltd. (“LGD”). The Court reserved judgment on several evidentiary objections raised by the parties during the course of the trial. The parties have briefed their respective positions on the evidentiary matters raised, and this Memorandum Opinion constitutes the Court’s rulings with regard to the pending…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Ronald Keith BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Francis J. McQueeney v. Wilmington Trust Company, Trustee, and Anndep Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Maureen Deal Phillip Deal, Parents, on Behalf of Zachary Deal v. Hamilton County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- APEX Financial Options, LLC v. GilbertsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022
- Innovative Memory Systems Inc. v. Micron Technology Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022
- bioMerieux, S.A. v. Hologic Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020