Legal Opinion

United States v. Mudekunye

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 11, 2011No. 18-30908PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Per curiam

Fabian Muyaba, Joseph Mudekunye, and three co-defendants were charged in a 39-count indictment stemming from their tax-fraud conspiracy. Muyaba, Mudekunye, and one co-defendant were convicted in a joint jury trial. Muyaba challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions; the district court’s applying two Sentencing Guideline enhancements; and its ordering part of his sentence to run consecutively. Mudekunye challenges its failure to sever his trial from Muyaba’s; and his sentence as being procedurally unreasonable. We AFFIRM in part and VACATE and REMAND in part.

I

From…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. Tommy Ray HigdonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. United States v. Fernando FragaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Paul SuarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. John TerrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Aaron HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Arturo Cancino-TrinidadCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API