State Ex Rel. Hatch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant contends that because the attorney general lacks the independent authority to bring this lawsuit against an insurance company, the district court erred in determining it had subject matter jurisdiction.
FACTS
In March 1999, respondent State of Minnesota, by the attorney general, brought an action against appellant American Family Mutual Insurance Company concerning appellant’s payment of claims for storm damage. Respondent alleged that appellant violated consumer protection laws prohibiting false advertising, deceptive trade practices, consumer fraud, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Morris v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State ex rel. Young v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Head v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Humphrey on Behalf of State v. McLarenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Edina Community Lutheran Church v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Favors v. KneiselCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Edina Community Lutheran Church v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004