Legal Opinion

Favors v. Kneisel

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 25, 2017No. A17-0506PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REILLY, Judge

Appellant Joseph Anthony Favors challenges the district court’s dismissal of his claim against respondent-employees of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, arguing that the district court erred by holding that (1) Minnesota Statutes section 144.651 does not create a private cause of action and (2) appellant cannot establish a substantive due-process violation. Because Minnesota Statutes section 144.651 does not create a private cause of action and appellant failed to assert a cognizable substantive due-process claim, we affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Joseph Anthony Favors is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kevin Monahan v. Dorchester Counseling Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Becker v. Mayo FoundationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Finn v. Alliance BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. Mumm v. MornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dorosh v. Minnesota Department of Human Services CommissionerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
  2. Favors v. JohnstonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API