Favors v. Kneisel
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REILLY, Judge
Appellant Joseph Anthony Favors challenges the district court’s dismissal of his claim against respondent-employees of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, arguing that the district court erred by holding that (1) Minnesota Statutes section 144.651 does not create a private cause of action and (2) appellant cannot establish a substantive due-process violation. Because Minnesota Statutes section 144.651 does not create a private cause of action and appellant failed to assert a cognizable substantive due-process claim, we affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Joseph Anthony Favors is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kevin Monahan v. Dorchester Counseling Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Becker v. Mayo FoundationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Finn v. Alliance BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Mumm v. MornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dorosh v. Minnesota Department of Human Services CommissionerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
- Favors v. JohnstonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021