Legal Opinion

United States v. Mento

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 3, 2000No. 99-4813PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG and Senior Judge WILLIAMS joined.

OPINION

KING, Circuit Judge:

Joseph H. Mentó, III, was convicted in the district court of possessing child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). Mentó entered a guilty plea to the charge, reserving the right to appeal the lower court’s determination that the statute, as amended by the Child Pornography Protection Act of 1996 (“CPPA” or “the Act”), is constitutional on its face. The federal courts of appeals that have considered this issue are split on its proper…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. United States v. Ronald David EllysonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. LindhDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
  4. United States v. HarmsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. MoraceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API