Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America v. Medows
District Court, N.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN DEFENDANTS’ FAVOR
STAFFORD, District Judge.
Before the court is the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 34) docketed September 20, 2001. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiffs motion (doc. 7) for preliminary injunction be denied. The plaintiff has filed objections (doc. 43) to the report and recommendation, and the defendants have filed a response (doc. 46) to the plaintiffs objections. This court has reviewed the entire record, including the transcript of proceedings before the magistrate judge. For the reasons stated by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America v. Department of Community HealthMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003